Repository logo
 
Publication

Coping strategies and their relationship with subjective distress due to the COVID-19 pandemic in Brazil

dc.contributor.authorAlvares Duarte Bonini Campos, Juliana
dc.contributor.authorCampos, Lucas
dc.contributor.authorMartins, Bianca Gonzalez
dc.contributor.authorMaroco, J. P.
dc.date.accessioned2022-07-28T19:25:20Z
dc.date.available2022-07-28T19:25:20Z
dc.date.issued2022
dc.description.abstractObjectives: To identify the strategies used by Brazilian adults for coping with the COVID-19 pandemic and to verify the effect of these strategies on subjective distress. Methods: This was a cross-sectional observational study with online data collection in May/June 2020, November/December 2020, and May/June 2021. The BriefCOPE Inventory and the Impact of Event Scale (IES-R) were used. The prevalence of strategies used at different time points was estimated with a 95% confidence interval and compared with a z-test. A multiple logistic regression model was constructed and the odds ratio (OR, 95%CI) was calculated to verify the probability of subjective distress according to the coping strategy used. Results: Younger individuals had a lower prevalence of adaptive strategies, which increased significantly with age. Participants with higher income levels had a higher prevalence of adaptive strategies, as did those who were never diagnosed with a mental health disorder. The prevalence of using only maladaptive strategies ranged from 6.1% to 5.4% (p > 0.05). The use of problem-centered strategies (Active Coping and Planning), venting of emotions, and substance use increased with time, while acceptance and behavioral disengagement decreased. In general, the population used problem-centered strategies, but the high prevalence of problem avoidance was striking. Positive reinterpretation and acceptance were protective factors for subjective distress, whereas maladaptive strategies increased the chance of distress. The presence of a negative valence component (problem- or emotion-centered) increased the chance of subjective distress, whereas strategies based on Problem Solving acted as a protective factor. Conclusion: Coping strategies were significantly associated to subjective distress and have changed since the beginning of the pandemic. Strategies focused on emotion regulation may be relevant to minimize distress.pt_PT
dc.description.versioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionpt_PT
dc.identifier.citationCoping Strategies and Their Relationship With Subjective Distress due to the COVID-19 Pandemic in Brazil. (2022). Psychological Reports, 1.pt_PT
dc.identifier.doi10.1177/00332941221110538pt_PT
dc.identifier.issn00332941
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10400.12/8750
dc.language.isoengpt_PT
dc.peerreviewedyespt_PT
dc.publisherSagept_PT
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/pt_PT
dc.subjectCoping strategiespt_PT
dc.subjectPandemicpt_PT
dc.subjectCOVID-19pt_PT
dc.subjectSubjective distresspt_PT
dc.titleCoping strategies and their relationship with subjective distress due to the COVID-19 pandemic in Brazilpt_PT
dc.typejournal article
dspace.entity.typePublication
oaire.citation.conferencePlaceUnited Statespt_PT
oaire.citation.endPage24pt_PT
oaire.citation.startPage1pt_PT
oaire.citation.titlePsychological Reportspt_PT
person.familyNameAlvares Duarte Bonini Campos
person.familyNameCampos
person.familyNameGonzalez Martins
person.familyNamePaulo Marôco Domingos
person.givenNameJuliana
person.givenNameLucas
person.givenNameBianca
person.givenNameJoão
person.identifierD-4339-2015
person.identifier.ciencia-idD81B-BE2D-9B43
person.identifier.orcid0000-0001-7123-5585
person.identifier.orcid0000-0003-1514-5758
person.identifier.orcid0000-0003-1220-103X
person.identifier.orcid0000-0001-9214-5378
person.identifier.ridG-7023-2016
person.identifier.scopus-author-id18433502000
person.identifier.scopus-author-id6602157617
rcaap.rightsopenAccesspt_PT
rcaap.typearticlept_PT
relation.isAuthorOfPublication8db54fe1-2ab9-4bcd-b044-a51fe8ea6ad9
relation.isAuthorOfPublication0f1a27e8-04b7-4881-ad77-2b1e3bfee969
relation.isAuthorOfPublicationf5664035-12c0-46bc-a1ae-6e20bcadadb5
relation.isAuthorOfPublication14869d29-f5c4-4476-a172-ad161c7400e6
relation.isAuthorOfPublication.latestForDiscovery14869d29-f5c4-4476-a172-ad161c7400e6

Files

Original bundle
Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Loading...
Thumbnail Image
Name:
Psychological reports 2022.pdf
Size:
736.43 KB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format
License bundle
Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
No Thumbnail Available
Name:
license.txt
Size:
1.61 KB
Format:
Item-specific license agreed upon to submission
Description: