Name: | Description: | Size: | Format: | |
---|---|---|---|---|
570.97 KB | Adobe PDF |
Authors
Advisor(s)
Abstract(s)
Cada método de ensino de uma lingua estrangeira
tem OS seus mCritos e fraquezas. Factores como OS
objectivos, a classe etaria dos alunos e OS seus estadios
de desenvolvimento mental devem ser tidos em conta
na escolha do mCtodo de ensino.
Como alunos de inglts, OS adultos tCm vantagens e
desvantagens, e normalmente as desvantagens sBo
mais importantes que as vantagens. Como obter OS
melhores resultados com aquele tip0 de alunos? Porqu&
escolher um determinado mCtodo num dad0 contexto
e n2o noutro? SBo estas as questBes que este artigo
aborda.
Como nenhum dos mCtodos na historia do ensino
de linguas consegue atingir todos OS objectivos de uma
vez s6, o autor defende que para OS adultos principiantes
devem ser preferidos OS MCtodo Natural e o da
Resposta Fisica Total, enquanto a Abordagem Comunicativa
e a Aprendizagem da Lingua em Comunidade
s20 mais adequadas para OS alunos em estidios intermCdios
e avanqados. 0 ensino da composiqBo escrita
devem ser guiado e integrado corn o ensino de outras
compet6ncia.s linguisticas, sobretudo nos estidios
elementares.
ABSTRACT: Each teaching method has its own strenths and weaknesses. Factors such as purposes, age groups and stages of mental development are to be taken into account in terms of the adoption of a teaching method. Adult learners of English have their own advantages and disadvantages, too. Normally, the latter outweigh the former. How to obtain the best result out of them? Why take a certain method rather than another is a given context? These are the questions this paper attempts to account for. Since none of the methods in the history of language teaching so far can fulfil1 the desired goals all in one go, the author holds that for adult beginners, both the Natural Method and Total Physical Response are preferred while the Communicative Approach and Community Language Learning are to find favour with those at intermediate and advanced levels, and that the teaching of composition writing should be guided and integrated with the training of other language skills, particularly at an elementary level.
ABSTRACT: Each teaching method has its own strenths and weaknesses. Factors such as purposes, age groups and stages of mental development are to be taken into account in terms of the adoption of a teaching method. Adult learners of English have their own advantages and disadvantages, too. Normally, the latter outweigh the former. How to obtain the best result out of them? Why take a certain method rather than another is a given context? These are the questions this paper attempts to account for. Since none of the methods in the history of language teaching so far can fulfil1 the desired goals all in one go, the author holds that for adult beginners, both the Natural Method and Total Physical Response are preferred while the Communicative Approach and Community Language Learning are to find favour with those at intermediate and advanced levels, and that the teaching of composition writing should be guided and integrated with the training of other language skills, particularly at an elementary level.
Description
Keywords
Métodos de ensino Contexto Transferência Estádios elementares Aquisição/aprendizagem Mecanismos Meios Teaching methods Context Transfer Elementary (primary, beginning) Acquisition/learning Mechanism Medium
Citation
Analise Psicológica XV(4), 587-593
Publisher
Instituto Superior de Psicologia Aplicada