Name: | Description: | Size: | Format: | |
---|---|---|---|---|
76.27 KB | Adobe PDF |
Advisor(s)
Abstract(s)
É inegável que, no contexto da investigação sobre as implicações desenvolvimentais das relações de
vinculação, o conceito de Modelos Internos Dinâmicos (MID) tem vindo a assumir uma capacidade
explicativa crescente e extensiva (ver Bretherton & Munholland, 2008; Thompson, 2008b). Todavia,
apesar da centralidade dos MID na Teoria da vinculação, é de referir o “caos calmo” que parece existir
na literatura ainda hoje, mais de 50 décadas de estudos depois, à volta da utilização desta metáfora
conceptual que, embora apelativa, não corresponde ainda a um constructo teórico solidamente definido
e empiricamente testável (ver Bretherton, 2005; Delius, Bovenschen, & Spangler, 2008; Thompson,
2008a). De forma a percebermos melhor o que poderá contribuir para este cenário de “caos calmo”,
analisaremos, seguidamente, a evolução histórica do conceito, no âmbito da Teoria da vinculação,
partindo das primeiras formulações de Bowlby e integrando contributos posteriores.
ABSTRACT: It’s noticeable that, inside the research literature on the developmental implications of children’s attachment behavior, the Internal Working Models (IWM) concept has assumed a wide explicative capacity (see Bretherton & Munholland, 2008; Thompson, 2008b). Albeit the centrality of the IWM within the Attachment Theory’s framework, it’s generally recognized the “calm caos” that still exist around the use of this “user-friendly” conceptual metaphor, not yet considered a well-defined, empirical testable construct (see Bretherton, 2005; Delius, Bovenschen, & Spangler, 2008; Thompson, 2008a). Aiming to bring together at least part of this, in this paper we present a historical retrospective of the concept, starting with Bowlbys first ideas, and integrating later contributions.
ABSTRACT: It’s noticeable that, inside the research literature on the developmental implications of children’s attachment behavior, the Internal Working Models (IWM) concept has assumed a wide explicative capacity (see Bretherton & Munholland, 2008; Thompson, 2008b). Albeit the centrality of the IWM within the Attachment Theory’s framework, it’s generally recognized the “calm caos” that still exist around the use of this “user-friendly” conceptual metaphor, not yet considered a well-defined, empirical testable construct (see Bretherton, 2005; Delius, Bovenschen, & Spangler, 2008; Thompson, 2008a). Aiming to bring together at least part of this, in this paper we present a historical retrospective of the concept, starting with Bowlbys first ideas, and integrating later contributions.
Description
Keywords
Bowlby Mecanismos de defesa Modelos internos dinâmicos Teoria da vinculação Defense mechanisms Internal working models Attachment theory SFRH/BD/47802/2008
Citation
Análise Psicológica, 32, 279-288
Publisher
Instituto Superior de Psicologia Aplicada