Browsing by Author "Calheiros, Maria Manuela"
Now showing 1 - 8 of 8
Results Per Page
Sort Options
- Adaptação do Questionário de Autonomia nos Adolescentes (QAA) para a língua portuguesaPublication . João, Graça; Calheiros, Maria Manuela; Martins, AnaO presente estudo tem como objectivo principal apresentar a versão portuguesa do Questionário de Autonomia nos Adolescentes, traduzido e adaptado a partir do Adolescent Autonomy Questionnaire (Noom, 1999). De forma a observar as qualidades psicométricas da versão portuguesa procedeu-se à análise da estrutura factorial, análise da fidelidade, análise da sensibilidade e correlações inter- -factores. Os resultados obtidos com uma amostra de 171 adolescentes indicaram, através de análise factorial confirmatória, que o modelo original constituído por três dimensões não se revelou adequado à estrutura correlacional observada. Neste sentido, recorreu-se a uma análise exploratória que reproduziu uma estrutura composta por quatro factores – Auto-determinação; Independência; Autonomia cognitiva e Autonomia emocional. Em termos gerais, observaram-se indícios favoráveis à adequabilidade da presente versão do instrumento para a população adolescente portuguesa em contexto escolar. As diferenças observadas entre os participantes em função da idade (14-16 anos vs. 17-19 anos) são consistentes com os resultados obtidos nos estudos do instrumento original, fornecendo evidências adicionais favoráveis à validade da versão portuguesa.
- Adaptation of nussbaum's capabilities framework to community mental health: A consumer-based capabilities measurePublication . Sacchetto, Beatrice; Ornelas, José; Calheiros, Maria Manuela; Shinn, MarybethThe capabilities approach provides a rich evaluative framework to guide transformative change in the community mental health system. This study reports the content and construct validity and psychometric properties of a contextualized measure of the extent to which mental health programs foster achieved capabilities. The Achieved Capabilities Questionnaire for Community Mental Health (ACQ-CMH), adapted from Nussbaum's capabilities framework, was developed previously with consumer collaboration. Content validity was assessed through a collaborative process, involving a panel of eight consumers, staff members, and senior researchers. The resulting shorter version (ACQ-CMH-98) was completed by 332 community mental health consumers sampled throughout Portugal. Factor (PCA) analysis, internal consistency reliability, and test-retest reliability over 2 weeks (N = 33) showed good psychometric properties. The resulting six-factor structure with 48 items explains 48.88% of the total variance (KMO = 0.89; Bartlett p = .00). Internal consistency of the obtained dimensions ranges from .91 to .76. Associations of the measure with recovery, quality of life, and psychological distress scales add further evidence of construct validity. The adaptation of Nussbaum's framework stressed specific components that may enhance understanding and change within the community mental health system.
- Adaptation of Nussbaum's Capabilities Framework to Community Mental Health: A Consumer-Based Capabilities MeasurePublication . Sacchetto, Beatrice; Ornelas, José; Calheiros, Maria Manuela; Shinn, MarybethThe capabilities approach provides a rich evaluative framework to guide transformative change in the community mental health system. This study reports the content and construct validity and psychometric properties of a contextualized measure of the extent to which mental health programs foster achieved capabilities. The Achieved Capabilities Questionnaire for Community Mental Health (ACQ-CMH), adapted from Nussbaum's capabilities framework, was developed previously with consumer collaboration. Content validity was assessed through a collaborative process, involving a panel of eight consumers, staff members, and senior researchers. The resulting shorter version (ACQ-CMH-98) was completed by 332 community mental health consumers sampled throughout Portugal. Factor (PCA) analysis, internal consistency reliability, and test-retest reliability over 2 weeks (N = 33) showed good psychometric properties. The resulting six-factor structure with 48 items explains 48.88% of the total variance (KMO = 0.89; Bartlett p = .00). Internal consistency of the obtained dimensions ranges from .91 to .76. Associations of the measure with recovery, quality of life, and psychological distress scales add further evidence of construct validity. The adaptation of Nussbaum's framework stressed specific components that may enhance understanding and change within the community mental health system.
- Construção e determinação das qualidades psicométricas do Questionário de Suporte Social Institucional na Saúde (QSSIS)Publication . Calheiros, Maria Manuela; Paulino, Ana PaulaEste estudo tem como objectivo apresentar uma proposta de instrumento para aceder à percepção do suporte social institucional na saúde: o Questionário de Suporte Social Institucional na Saúde (QSSIS) estudando as suas características métricas. Apesar do reconhecimento dos efeitos positivos na saúde do suporte social poucos estudos abordam a temática do suporte social fornecido por técnicos de saúde. Os resultados obtidos com uma amostra de 328 adolescentes, mostram valores adequados de consistência interna e sensibilidade. A análise da estrutura factorial do QSSIS incluiu duas dimensões do constructo: estrutural e funcional. A dimensão estrutural agrupou sete itens em três factores: Tempo, Localização e Burocracia. A dimensão funcional incluiu 30 itens agrupados segundo cinco factores, denominados de Suporte Emocional/Relacional, Suporte de Estima, Suporte Social Tangível – Saúde; Suporte Social Tangível – Educação Sexual e Suporte Avaliativo. A validade de constructo realizada com o Social Support Questionnaire (SSQ6; Sarason, Sarasom, Shearin, & Pierce, 1987) e a validade concorrente medida pela recorrência aos serviços de saúde, evidenciou que o Suporte de Estima é o factor mais correlacionado com o suporte social informal avaliado pela SSQ6 e o Suporte Tangível na Saúde e a Acessibilidade Temporal, os que mais estão associados à procura dos cuidados de saúde.
- Programa de intervenção nas interacções pais-filhos “Desenvolver a Sorrir” – Estudo exploratórioPublication . Zuzarte, Michelle Cristina Luis; Calheiros, Maria ManuelaEste artigo descreve um Programa de intervenção nas interacções pais-filhos, em contextos lúdicos de aprendizagem, o qual é direccionado para famílias “de risco” com crianças até aos 3 anos. Apresenta ainda, um estudo de carácter exploratório onde se avalia a eficácia do programa. O Programa, que tem por objectivo desenvolver competências parentais através da modelagem e experimentação de interacções positivas em sete sessões, foi aplicado a 19 díades pais (Idade M=28.5; DP=9.48) criança (Idade M=21 meses; DP=0.99) em contexto domiciliário. As interacções das 19 díades foram avaliadas com o NCATS – Teaching Scale e o HOME utilizando-se um desenho de avaliação pré-pós teste. Os resultados indicam diferenças significativas em todas as áreas do meio da criança (estimulação diária, materiais lúdicos, ambiente, envolvimento e responsividade emocional e verbal dos pais) e da qualidade da interacção das díades (sensibilidade aos sinais, resposta ao descontentamento, promoção do desenvolvimento, clareza dos sinais e responsividade ao adulto). Não obstante o carácter exploratório do estudo, considera-se que quer a adesão e satisfação dos pais, quer os efeitos positivos do programa nas interacções das díades apontam para a pertinência da prossecução do seu estudo de validação com vista à sua generalização.
- The Achieved Capabilities Questionnaire for Community Mental Health (ACQ‐CMH): A consumer‐based measure for the evaluation of community mental health interventionsPublication . Sacchetto, Beatrice; Ornelas, José; Calheiros, Maria ManuelaThe capabilities approach offers a multidimensional, ecological, and agent‐centered framework that may inspire models of intervention and evaluation. Agrowing number of measures grounded on the capabilities approach for outcomemeasurement are appearing. Regarding community mental health, newconsumer‐valued measures—constructed in collaboration with consumers—arehere considered crucial for a transformative shift. Meanwhile, new measurementsneed to provide psychometric evidence to enable proper choice and applica-tion. The Achieved Capabilities Questionnaire for Community Mental Health(ACQ‐CMH) was developed in collaboration with consumers of communitymental health services. It aims to assess consumers' capabilities achieved throughprogram support. The present paper shows advancements in the measurevalidation through a confirmatory factor analysis within a sample of communitymental health consumers (N= 225). Reliability and construct‐related validity werealso observed. A structural solution composed offive factors and 43 itemsrevealed a better modelfit than that obtained in a previous exploratory study.Findings support the reliability, sensibility, and both convergent and discriminantvalidity of using the ACQ‐CMH in the evaluation of community mental healthinterventions. The ACQ‐CMH offers a consumer‐valued framework with specificdimensions and indicators of capabilities for use in a routine service evaluationsetting
- The Achieved Capabilities Questionnaire for Community Mental Health (ACQ‐CMH): a consumer‐based measure for the evaluation of community mental health interventionsPublication . Sacchetto, Beatrice; Ornelas, José; Calheiros, Maria ManuelaThe capabilities approach offers a multidimensional, ecological, and agent‐ centered framework that may inspire models of intervention and evaluation. A growing number of measures grounded on the capabilities approach for outcome measurement are appearing. Regarding community mental health, new consumer‐valued measures—constructed in collaboration with consumers—are here considered crucial for a transformative shift. Meanwhile, new measurements need to provide psychometric evidence to enable proper choice and application. The Achieved Capabilities Questionnaire for Community Mental Health (ACQ‐CMH) was developed in collaboration with consumers of community mental health services. It aims to assess consumers' capabilities achieved through program support. The present paper shows advancements in the measure validation through a confirmatory factor analysis within a sample of community mental health consumers (N = 225). Reliability and construct‐related validity were also observed. A structural solution composed of five factors and 43 items revealed a better model fit than that obtained in a previous exploratory study. Findings support the reliability, sensibility, and both convergent and discriminant validity of using the ACQ‐CMH in the evaluation of community mental health interventions. The ACQ‐CMH offers a consumer‐valued framework with specific dimensions and indicators of capabilities for use in a routine service evaluation setting.
- The Achieved Capabilities Questionnaire for Community Mental Health (ACQ‐CMH): a consumer‐based measure for the evaluation of community mental health interventionsPublication . Sacchetto, Beatrice; Ornelas, José; Calheiros, Maria ManuelaThe capabilities approach offers a multidimensional, ecological, and agent‐ centered framework that may inspire models of intervention and evaluation. A growing number of measures grounded on the capabilities approach for outcome measurement are appearing. Regarding community mental health, new consumer‐valued measures—constructed in collaboration with consumers—are here considered crucial for a transformative shift. Meanwhile, new measurements need to provide psychometric evidence to enable proper choice and application. The Achieved Capabilities Questionnaire for Community Mental Health (ACQ‐CMH) was developed in collaboration with consumers of community mental health services. It aims to assess consumers' capabilities achieved through program support. The present paper shows advancements in the measure validation through a confirmatory factor analysis within a sample of community mental health consumers (N = 225). Reliability and construct‐related validity were also observed. A structural solution composed of five factors and 43 items revealed a better model fit than that obtained in a previous exploratory study. Findings support the reliability, sensibility, and both convergent and discriminant validity of using the ACQ‐CMH in the evaluation of community mental health interventions. The ACQ‐CMH offers a consumer‐valued framework with specific dimensions and indicators of capabilities for use in a routine service evaluation setting.