Loading...
Publication
Empenhamento(s) organizacional(is): Dois laços afectivos, dois instrumentais, um normativo e um de ausência
| Name: | Description: | Size: | Format: | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 213.13 KB | Adobe PDF |
Advisor(s)
Abstract(s)
Este artigo visa testar um hexa-modelo dimensional do empenhamento organizacional
sugerido em pesquisas anteriores de Rego (2002b, 2003). O modelo difere do esquema tri-dimensional
mais comum (afectivo, normativo e instrumental) no que concerne a três aspectos: a) a faceta
afectiva é desmembrada em duas (empenhamento afectivo; futuro comum); b) a faceta instrumental
é dividida nas facetas “escassez de alternativas” e “sacrifícios elevados”; c) é sugerida uma nova dimensão,
designada “ausência psicológica” e que representa o “grau zero” do empenhamento. A
amostra é constituída por 366 indivíduos, com actividades profissionais bastante distintas. Análises
factoriais confirmatórias sugerem que o modelo de seis dimensões se ajusta satisfatoriamente aos
dados, embora os modelos de quatro e cinco dimensões denotem igualmente boas qualidades psicométricas.
This study aims at testing a six-factor model of organizational commitment suggested by Rego (2002b, 2003). The model differs from the more common three-factor model in what concerns three aspects: a) affective commitment is divided in two dimensions (affective commitment; future in common); b) continuance commitment is also divided (great sacrifices; scarcity of available alternatives); c) a new dimension (psychological absence) is proposed. The sample comprises 366 individuals with several occupations. Confirmatory factor analyses show that the six-factor model fits the data well, but the models with four or five factors have also good psychometric properties.
This study aims at testing a six-factor model of organizational commitment suggested by Rego (2002b, 2003). The model differs from the more common three-factor model in what concerns three aspects: a) affective commitment is divided in two dimensions (affective commitment; future in common); b) continuance commitment is also divided (great sacrifices; scarcity of available alternatives); c) a new dimension (psychological absence) is proposed. The sample comprises 366 individuals with several occupations. Confirmatory factor analyses show that the six-factor model fits the data well, but the models with four or five factors have also good psychometric properties.
Description
Keywords
Empenhamento afectivo Futuro comum Empenhamento normativo Ausência de alternativas Sacrifícios elevados Ausência psicológica Affective commitment Future in common Normative commitment Scarcity of available alternatives Great sacrifices Psychological absence
Citation
Comportamento Organizacional e Gestão, 10, 207-226
Publisher
Instituto Superior de Psicologia Aplicada