Advisor(s)
Abstract(s)
O propósito central deste trabalho consistiu em fazer uma revisão da literatura sobre o
conceito “Simbolismo” e a importância da função simbólica. Procurámos saber o estado actual
do conceito, o porquê desta capacidade simbólica e a sua importância para o desenvolvimento do
sujeito. Para tal foram trabalhadas as teorias de Sigmund Freud, de Ernest Jones, de Melanie
Klein, de Hanna Segal e de Harold Blum e analisadas as suas contribuições. Pretende-se,
portanto, fazer uma síntese da evolução do conceito bem como explorar quer os contributos dos
autores, quer as suas diferentes concepções sobre o Simbolismo. Freud, Jones e Blum fazem uma
utilização restrita do conceito, enquanto Klein e Segal utilizam o conceito num sentido mais
alargado. Freud partiu da análise dos sonhos. Klein salientou a importância da relação. Jones
distinguiu o simbolo psicanalítico de outras formas de representação indirecta como as metáforas.
Similarmente, Blum distinguiu o símbolo psicanalítico das palavras. Segal apresenta a relação
simbólica como uma relação a três e não a dois, uma relação entre simbolo, simbolizado e a
pessoa para quem um simboliza o outro. Procuraremos perceber o caminho percorrido entre
Freud e Segal.
ABSTRACT: The purpose of this work was to do a literature review on the concept of symbolism and the importance of symbolic function. We tried to know the current status of the concept, why this symbolic capacity and its importance to the development of the subject. For this we worked on theories of Sigmund Freud, Ernest Jones, Melanie Klein, Hanna Segal and Harold Blum and analyzed their contributions. It is intended therefore to summarize the evolution of the concept and want to explore the contributions of the authors or their different conceptions of Symbolism. Freud, Jones and Blum make a restricted use of the concept, while Klein and Segal use the concept in a broader sense. Freud started from the analysis of dreams. Klein stressed the importance of the relationship. Jones distinguished psychoanalytic symbol of other forms of indirect representation as metaphors. Similarly, Blum distinguished psychoanalytic symbol of words. Segal presents the symbolic relation as a relation to three rather than two, a relationship between symbol, symbolized and symbolizing a person to whom the other. We will seek to realize the path between Freud and Segal.
ABSTRACT: The purpose of this work was to do a literature review on the concept of symbolism and the importance of symbolic function. We tried to know the current status of the concept, why this symbolic capacity and its importance to the development of the subject. For this we worked on theories of Sigmund Freud, Ernest Jones, Melanie Klein, Hanna Segal and Harold Blum and analyzed their contributions. It is intended therefore to summarize the evolution of the concept and want to explore the contributions of the authors or their different conceptions of Symbolism. Freud, Jones and Blum make a restricted use of the concept, while Klein and Segal use the concept in a broader sense. Freud started from the analysis of dreams. Klein stressed the importance of the relationship. Jones distinguished psychoanalytic symbol of other forms of indirect representation as metaphors. Similarly, Blum distinguished psychoanalytic symbol of words. Segal presents the symbolic relation as a relation to three rather than two, a relationship between symbol, symbolized and symbolizing a person to whom the other. We will seek to realize the path between Freud and Segal.
Description
Dissertação de Mestrado apresentada ao ISPA - Instituto Universitário
Keywords
Simbolismo Relação simbólica Função simbólica Symbolism Symbolic relation Symbolic function