Name: | Description: | Size: | Format: | |
---|---|---|---|---|
203.49 KB | Adobe PDF |
Advisor(s)
Abstract(s)
Species with alternative reproductive tactics offer the opportunity to
analyse how behavioural and morphological traits are tuned to produce
successfully competing phenotypes within one sex. In the teleost fish
Salaria pavo, alternative reproductive tactics are sequential. The older
ornamented males compete for access to females by guarding a cavity to
which they attract females to spawn. Ornamented males that are found
without a nest are called ‘floaters’. Younger mature males which are too
small to compete with nest-holders attempt to ‘sneak’ as female mimics
into successful nests and release their sperm to fertilize freshly spawned
eggs. The alternative tactics in S. pavo are associated with different levels
of the androgens testosterone and 11-ketotestosterone, which have been
found to suppress immune function in several teleost fish. A field study
was carried out to analyse the relationship between these reproductive
tactics, androgens and blood levels of lymphocytes as a monitoring
method of immune function. We expected highest investment in the
immune system in sneakers because these have the lowest androgen
levels and functionally because investing in self-maintenance increases
their future prospect to switch tactic and to reproduce as a nest-holder.
Indeed, the relative count of lymphocytes correlated negatively with
body size and thus was highest in sneakers and lowest in nest-holders.
In concordance, 11-ketotestosterone and testosterone levels were found
to be higher in floaters and nest-holders than in sneakers. However, no
correlation was found between individual levels of testosterone or
11-ketotestosterone and lymphocytes. Thus, a trade-off between reproductive
traits associated with high androgen levels and immunocompetence
might exist at the level of alternative tactics but this might not be
explained by acute immunosuppressive effects of circulating androgens.
Description
Keywords
Citation
Ethology, 115, 555-565