Name: | Description: | Size: | Format: | |
---|---|---|---|---|
135.66 KB | Adobe PDF |
Advisor(s)
Abstract(s)
Video playbacks have been successfully applied to the study of visual communication in several groups of
animals. However, this technique is controversial as video monitors are designed with the human visual
system in mind. Differences between the visual capabilities of humans and other animals will lead to
perceptually different interpretations of video images. We simultaneously presented males and females of
the peacock blenny, Salaria pavo, with a live conspecific male and an online video image of the same
individual. Video images failed to elicit appropriate responses. Males were aggressive towards the live
male but not towards video images of the same male. Similarly, females courted only the live male and
spent more time near this stimulus. In contrast, females of the gynogenetic poecilid Poecilia formosa
showed an equal preference for a live and video image of a P. mexicana male, suggesting a response to live
animals as strong as to video images. We discuss differences between the species that may explain their
opposite reaction to video images.
Description
Keywords
Citation
Animal Behaviour, 60, 351-357