Name: | Description: | Size: | Format: | |
---|---|---|---|---|
655.61 KB | Adobe PDF |
Authors
Advisor(s)
Abstract(s)
Este estudo analisa a influência do nível de especialização
em Direito e do parentesco do agressor sobre o
julgamento de um caso de maus tratos físicos a um
menor. Em termos gerais, encontraram-se semelhanças
entre os dois níveis de especialização abordados (leigos e sub-especialistas), aspecto que abona a favor da
convergência das suas perspectivas acerca desta
problemática, tal como já evidenciado por outros trabalhos.
Também o parentesco do agressor do menor
(pai/padrasto) não produziu diferenças significativas
quanto à forma como este foi julgado.
This study analyses the influence of the level of expertise in Law, and of the defendants’ kinship on the judgment of a child physical abuse case. In general, there were found similarities between the two levels of expertise approached (lay persons and sub-experts), wich go in favour of the convergence of their perspectives about this problematic, as showed by other works. Also the kinship of the child’s agressor (father/stepfather) didn’t produce significant diferentes on the way he has been judged.
This study analyses the influence of the level of expertise in Law, and of the defendants’ kinship on the judgment of a child physical abuse case. In general, there were found similarities between the two levels of expertise approached (lay persons and sub-experts), wich go in favour of the convergence of their perspectives about this problematic, as showed by other works. Also the kinship of the child’s agressor (father/stepfather) didn’t produce significant diferentes on the way he has been judged.
Description
Keywords
Psicologia legal Especialização Maus tratos a menores Legal psychology Expertise Child abuse
Pedagogical Context
Citation
Análise Psicológica, 1(15), 139-148.
Publisher
Instituto Superior de Psicologia Aplicada