Loading...
Publication
Quiet Quitting Scale e Health Oriented Leadership Scale Tradução e estudo das propriedades psicométricas para o contexto laboral português
| Name: | Description: | Size: | Format: | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2.75 MB | Adobe PDF |
Advisor(s)
Abstract(s)
Objetivo: Tradução e estudo das propriedades psicométricas validação da Quiet Quitting Scale
(QQS) e a Health Oriented Leadership Scale (HoL) para a população portuguesa. Métodos: A
amostra foi constituída por 611 participantes com nacionalidade portuguesa, com idades entre os
18 e os 64 anos em contexto laboral. Os participantes preencheram um protocolo online composto
por um questionário sociodemográfico, Quiet Quitting Scale, a Escala de Stress Percepcionado
(PSS) e a Health Oriented Leadership Scale, tendo esta escala sido divida em duas subescalas Self
Care (HoL1) e Staff Care (HoL2). Resultados: A QQS mostrou uma adequada fidedignidade,
com valores Alfa de Cronbach próximo de 0,70, sendo que nas subescalas de Desapego e Falta de
Iniciativa apresentam consistências internas mais baixas (α .52 e .68). A HoL e a PSS
apresentaram boa consistência interna (α .96 e .878 respetivamente) nos índices globais. A análise
de validade convergente e divergente revelou correlações positivas significativas entre subescalas
relacionadas, como as subescalas da QQS Desapego e Falta de Iniciativa (r = 0.287), e correlações
negativas entre subescalas de diferentes escalas, como a PSS e Self Care (HoL1) (r = -0.482).
Essas correlações indicam que as escalas medem construtos distintos. Diferenças significativas
foram observadas nas subescalas de Desapego e PSS entre homens e mulheres, e na subescala
QQS Falta de Motivação e Staff Care (HoL2) entre setores público e privado. Os resultados da
Análise Fatorial Confirmatória (AFC) indicaram que a QQS apresentou excelentes índices de
ajuste (CFI = 0.994, TLI = 0.989, RMSEA = 0.025), assim como a subescala SelfCare (HoL1)
também apresentou bons índices de ajuste (CFI = 0.965, TLI = 0.951, RMSEA = 0.043). No
entanto, a subescala Staff Care (HoL2) teve índices de ajuste aceitáveis, mas menos ideais (CFI =
0.943, TLI = 0.935, RMSEA = 0.076). Conclusões: As escalas QQS e subescala Self Care (HoL1)
possuem boas qualidades psicométricas e são adequadas para uso na população portuguesa,
enquanto a subescala Staff Care (HoL2) pode ser utilizada com alguma precaução. Estes
resultados são relevantes para a pesquisa e prática em ambientes de trabalho, fornecendo
instrumentos válidos e confiáveis para avaliar comportamentos de quiet quitting e de práticas de
liderança orientadas para a saúde.
ABSTRACT: Objective: Translation and validation of the psychometric properties of the Quiet Quitting Scale (QQS) and the Health-Oriented Leadership Scale (HoL) for the Portuguese population. Methods: The sample consisted of 611 participants of Portuguese nationality, aged between 18 and 64 years, all employed. Participants completed an online protocol that included a sociodemographic questionnaire, the Quiet Quitting Scale, the Perceived Stress Scale (PSS), and the Health-Oriented Leadership Scale, which was divided into two subscales: Self Care (HoL1) and Staff Care (HoL2). Results: The QQS demonstrated adequate reliability, with Cronbach's Alpha values close to 0.70. However, the Detachment and Lack of Initiative subscales showed lower internal consistency (α = .52 and .68, respectively). The HoL and PSS showed good internal consistency (α = .96 and .878, respectively) at the global level. Convergent and divergent validity analyses revealed significant positive correlations between related subscales, such as Detachment and Lack of Initiative in QQS (r = 0.287), and negative correlations between subscales from different scales, such as PSS and Self Care (HoL1) (r = -0.482). These correlations indicate that the scales measure distinct constructs. Significant differences were observed in the Detachment and PSS subscales between men and women, as well as in the QQS Lack of Motivation subscale and Staff Care (HoL2) between public and private sectors. The results of the Confirmatory Factor Analysis (CFA) indicated that the QQ scale showed excellent fit indices (CFI = 0.994, TLI = 0.989, RMSEA = 0.025), and the Self Care subscale (HoL1) also showed good fit indices (CFI = 0.965, TLI = 0.951, RMSEA = 0.043). However, the Staff Care subscale (HoL2) showed acceptable, but less ideal, fit indices (CFI = 0.943, TLI = 0.935, RMSEA = 0.076). Conclusions: The QQ and the Self Care (HoL1) subscale demonstrated good psychometric qualities and are suitable for use in the Portuguese population, while the Staff Care (HoL2) subscale can be used with some caution. These results are relevant for research and practice in work environments, providing valid and reliable tools for assessing quiet quitting behaviors and health-oriented leadership practices.
ABSTRACT: Objective: Translation and validation of the psychometric properties of the Quiet Quitting Scale (QQS) and the Health-Oriented Leadership Scale (HoL) for the Portuguese population. Methods: The sample consisted of 611 participants of Portuguese nationality, aged between 18 and 64 years, all employed. Participants completed an online protocol that included a sociodemographic questionnaire, the Quiet Quitting Scale, the Perceived Stress Scale (PSS), and the Health-Oriented Leadership Scale, which was divided into two subscales: Self Care (HoL1) and Staff Care (HoL2). Results: The QQS demonstrated adequate reliability, with Cronbach's Alpha values close to 0.70. However, the Detachment and Lack of Initiative subscales showed lower internal consistency (α = .52 and .68, respectively). The HoL and PSS showed good internal consistency (α = .96 and .878, respectively) at the global level. Convergent and divergent validity analyses revealed significant positive correlations between related subscales, such as Detachment and Lack of Initiative in QQS (r = 0.287), and negative correlations between subscales from different scales, such as PSS and Self Care (HoL1) (r = -0.482). These correlations indicate that the scales measure distinct constructs. Significant differences were observed in the Detachment and PSS subscales between men and women, as well as in the QQS Lack of Motivation subscale and Staff Care (HoL2) between public and private sectors. The results of the Confirmatory Factor Analysis (CFA) indicated that the QQ scale showed excellent fit indices (CFI = 0.994, TLI = 0.989, RMSEA = 0.025), and the Self Care subscale (HoL1) also showed good fit indices (CFI = 0.965, TLI = 0.951, RMSEA = 0.043). However, the Staff Care subscale (HoL2) showed acceptable, but less ideal, fit indices (CFI = 0.943, TLI = 0.935, RMSEA = 0.076). Conclusions: The QQ and the Self Care (HoL1) subscale demonstrated good psychometric qualities and are suitable for use in the Portuguese population, while the Staff Care (HoL2) subscale can be used with some caution. These results are relevant for research and practice in work environments, providing valid and reliable tools for assessing quiet quitting behaviors and health-oriented leadership practices.
Description
Dissertação de Mestrado apresentada no ISPA – Instituto Universitário para obtenção de grau de Mestre na especialidade de
Psicologia Clínica
Keywords
Quiet quitting Turnover Desistência silenciosa Liderança Desapego health-oriented leadership Silent resignation Leadership Detachment Health-oriented
Citation
Matos, S. C. F. P. (2024). Quiet Quitting Scale e Health Oriented Leadership Scale Tradução e estudo das propriedades psicométricas para o contexto laboral português [Dissertação de mestrado] Ispa - Instituto Superior