Name: | Description: | Size: | Format: | |
---|---|---|---|---|
153.13 KB | Adobe PDF |
Advisor(s)
Abstract(s)
In birds, the period spent brooding or guarding young chicks is highly variable, but such variation has seldom been
studied. Previous single-year studies of Antarctic petrels Thalassoica antarctica and grey-headed albatrosses Thalassarche
chrysostoma revealed a pronounced seasonal decline in brood-guarding duration and gave rise to the ‘synchronisation
hypothesis’, which suggests that some of the variation in the length of the brood-guarding stage is related to predictable
seasonal changes in the risk of chick predation. We tested the predictions of this and three other hypotheses in a two-site,
four-year study of the black-browed albatross T. melanophris. The existence of a pronounced seasonal decline in broodguarding
duration was apparent at both sites, and in years of contrasting food availability, providing further support for
the ‘synchronisation hypothesis’. Alternative explanations for this pattern are that short brood-guarding periods for latehatched
chicks result from a seasonal decline in food availability or from the fact that early nesting birds are of higher
individual quality. However, these explanations are at odds with the absence of a seasonal decline in early chick growth or
in probability of chick survival. Furthermore, adult quality (measured as past reproductive performance) had a weak and
inconsistent effect on the duration of brood-guarding. Weather changes explained some of the variation in broodguarding,
but there were no differences between regions of contrasting climates. Individual pairs displayed a degree of
inter-annual consistency in brood-guarding duration and, at least in some years, longer brood-guarding resulted in higher
fledging probability. We speculate that a higher investment in brood-guarding increases the cost of reproduction, which
counteracts other selective pressures that would otherwise lead to longer brood-guarding durations.
Description
Keywords
Citation
Journal of Avian Biology, 41, 460-469