Loading...
Research Project
Developmental and transgenerational effects of oxytocin-like peptides on social behavior: an eco-evo-devo approach using zebrafish as a model
Funder
Authors
Publications
Expanding the concept of social behavior to interspecific interactions
Publication . Oliveira, Rui F.; Bshary, Redouan
In pretty much any species, an individual's survival and reproduction depends crucially on the outcome of interactions with other individuals. Key interactions may take
place between individuals of the same species but also between individuals belonging to different species. However, the most accepted definition of social behavior
only considers interactions between conspecifics. Here, we argue that the distinction between intra- and interspecific interactions is largely artificial and hinders the
integration of the historically separately developed concepts. At the ultimate level,
given that the ecological landscape of organisms is composed both by interactions
with conspecifics and with heterospecifics, and both types of interactions may have
evolutionary consequences. Although intraspecific interactions usually have a higher
impact in fitness because in most species interactions relevant for reproduction (mating, parenting) exclusively involve conspecifics, and interactions relevant for survival
are more probable between conspecifics because they share the same ecological
niche, hence competing for the same resources (e.g., food, shelter), there are notable
exceptions in both fitness components (e.g., heterospecific mating in parthenogenic
all-female species; heterospecific brood parasitism; heterospecific aggression in sympatric species that compete for shared resources). At the proximate level, behaviors
and cognitive decision-making rules used to interact with other organisms may be
shared between intra- and interspecific interactions, and the mechanistic differences
between conspecific social behaviors used in distinct functional domains, such as
mating, aggression, or parenting, can be more expressive than those found within the
same functional domain between conspecific and heterospecific behavior. Therefore,
there are neither fundamental conceptual (ultimate) reasons, nor key differences in
mechanisms underlying behaviors involved in conspecific vs. heterospecific interactions that support the exclusion of interspecific interactions from the conceptual
framework of social behavior
Sex differences in aggression are paralleled by differential activation of the brain social decision-making network in Zebrafish
Publication . Scaia, Maria Florencia; Akinrinade, Ibukun; Petri, Giovanni; Oliveira, Rui F.
Although aggression is more prevalent in males, females also express aggressive
behaviors and in specific ecological contexts females can be more aggressive than
males. The aim of this work is to assess sex differences in aggression and to characterize
the patterns of neuronal activation of the social-decision making network (SDMN) in
response to intra-sexual aggression in both male and female zebrafish. Adult fish were
exposed to social interaction with a same-sex opponent and all behavioral displays,
latency, and time of resolution were quantified. After conflict resolution, brains were
sampled and sex differences on functional connectivity throughout the SDMN were
assessed by immunofluorescence of the neuronal activation marker pS6. Results
suggest that both sexes share a similar level of motivation for aggression, but female
encounters show shorter conflict resolution and a preferential use of antiparallel displays
instead of overt aggression, showing a reduction of putative maladaptive effects.
Although there are no sex differences in the neuronal activation in any individual
brain area from the SDMN, agonistic interactions increased neuronal activity in most
brain areas in both sexes. Functional connectivity was assessed using bootstrapped
adjacency matrices that capture the co-activation of the SDMN nodes. Male winners
increased the overall excitation and showed no changes in inhibition across the SDMN,
whereas female winners and both male and female losers showed a decrease in both
excitation and inhibition of the SDMN in comparison to non-interacting control fish.
Moreover, network centrality analysis revealed both shared hubs, as well as sex-specific
hubs, between the sexes for each social condition in the SDMN. In summary, a distinct
neural activation pattern associated with social experience during fights was found
for each sex, suggesting a sex-specific differential activation of the social brain as a consequence of social experience. Overall, our study adds insights into sex differences
in agonistic behavior and on the neuronal architecture of intrasexual aggression in
zebrafish.
Phenotypic architecture of sociality and its associated genetic polymorphisms in zebrafish
Publication . Gonçalves, Claúdia; Kareklas, Kyriacos; Teles, Magda C; Varela, Susana.A.M.; Costa, João; Leite, Ricardo B.; Paixão, Tiago; Oliveira, Rui Filipe
Sociality relies on motivational and cognitive components that may have evolved independently, or may have been linked by phenotypic correlations driven by a shared selective pressure for increased social competence. Furthermore, these components may be domain-specific or of general-domain across social and non-social contexts. Here, we used zebrafish to test if the motivational and cognitive components of social behavior are phenotypically linked and if they are domain specific or of general domain. The behavioral phenotyping of zebrafish in social and equivalent non-social tests shows that the motivational (preference) and cognitive (memory) components of sociality: (1) are independent from each other, hence not supporting the occurrence of a sociality syndrome; and (2) are phenotypically linked to non-social traits, forming two general behavioral modules, suggesting that sociality traits have been co-opted from general-domain motivational and cognitive traits. Moreover, the study of the association between single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) and each behavioral module further supports this view, since several SNPs from a list of candidate “social” genes, are statistically associated with the motivational, but not with the cognitive, behavioral module. Together, these results support the occurrence of general-domain motivational and cognitive behavioral modules in zebrafish, which have been co-opted for the social domain. © 2022 The Authors. Genes, Brain and Behavior published by International Behavioural and Neural Genetics Society and John Wiley & Sons Ltd.
Organizational Units
Description
Keywords
Contributors
Funders
Funding agency
Fundação para a Ciência e a Tecnologia
Funding programme
9471 - RIDTI
Funding Award Number
PTDC/BIA-COM/30627/2017