Name: | Description: | Size: | Format: | |
---|---|---|---|---|
1007.58 KB | Adobe PDF |
Advisor(s)
Abstract(s)
In pretty much any species, an individual's survival and reproduction depends crucially on the outcome of interactions with other individuals. Key interactions may take
place between individuals of the same species but also between individuals belonging to different species. However, the most accepted definition of social behavior
only considers interactions between conspecifics. Here, we argue that the distinction between intra- and interspecific interactions is largely artificial and hinders the
integration of the historically separately developed concepts. At the ultimate level,
given that the ecological landscape of organisms is composed both by interactions
with conspecifics and with heterospecifics, and both types of interactions may have
evolutionary consequences. Although intraspecific interactions usually have a higher
impact in fitness because in most species interactions relevant for reproduction (mating, parenting) exclusively involve conspecifics, and interactions relevant for survival
are more probable between conspecifics because they share the same ecological
niche, hence competing for the same resources (e.g., food, shelter), there are notable
exceptions in both fitness components (e.g., heterospecific mating in parthenogenic
all-female species; heterospecific brood parasitism; heterospecific aggression in sympatric species that compete for shared resources). At the proximate level, behaviors
and cognitive decision-making rules used to interact with other organisms may be
shared between intra- and interspecific interactions, and the mechanistic differences
between conspecific social behaviors used in distinct functional domains, such as
mating, aggression, or parenting, can be more expressive than those found within the
same functional domain between conspecific and heterospecific behavior. Therefore,
there are neither fundamental conceptual (ultimate) reasons, nor key differences in
mechanisms underlying behaviors involved in conspecific vs. heterospecific interactions that support the exclusion of interspecific interactions from the conceptual
framework of social behavior
Description
Keywords
Heterospecific aggression Heterospecific mating Heterospecific alloparental care Heterospecific cooperation Social interactions
Citation
Oliveira, R. F., & Bshary, R. (2021). Expanding the concept of social behavior to interspecific interactions. Ethology, 127(10), 758–773. https://doi.org/10.1111/eth.13194
Publisher
Wiley-Blackwell Publishing Ltd