Name: | Description: | Size: | Format: | |
---|---|---|---|---|
303.28 KB | Adobe PDF |
Advisor(s)
Abstract(s)
Four experiments tested the idea that people distinguish between biconditional, conditional, and enabling
intention conditionals by thinking about counterexamples. The experiments examined intention conditionals
that contain different types of reasons for actions, such as beliefs, goals, obligations, and social
norms, based on a corpus of 48 intention conditionals established through an extensive materials test (n
136). Experiment 1 (n 19) showed that retrieved alternative reasons suppress the affirmation of the
consequent and denial of the antecedent inferences from conditional intentions, whereas retrieved
disabling reasons suppress the modus ponens and modus tollens inferences from enabling intentions.
Experiment 2 (n 61) showed that the suppression effects also occur for explicitly provided alternatives
and disablers, for a large corpus of 80 intention conditionals. Experiment 3 (n 60) showed that the
suppression effects also occur for unfamiliar content, for which participants cannot rely on prior
knowledge or beliefs about probabilities. Experiment 4 (n 26) showed that participants retrieve
alternatives and disablers readily for intentions just as they do for causal conditionals. The implications
of the results for alternative accounts based on possibilities and probabilities are discussed.
Description
Keywords
Intentions Reasons Conditionals Disablers Counterexamples
Citation
Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 41, 55-76
Publisher
American Psychological Association