Repository logo
 
Publication

Supplemental material for a meta-analytical review of the familiarity temporal effect : testing assumptions of the attentional and the fluency-attributional accounts

dc.contributor.authorFernandes, Alexandre C.
dc.contributor.authorGarcia-Marques, Teresa
dc.date.accessioned2020-07-16T11:56:10Z
dc.date.available2020-07-16T11:56:10Z
dc.date.issued2020
dc.description.abstractThe current meta-analysis accumulates empirical findings for the familiarity temporal effect (FTE) in duration judgments (the duration of more familiar stimuli is judged to be longer than that of less familiar stimuli). It brings together data from 2 separate literatures: time perception and processing fluency. In doing so, this review offers more and stronger evidence for testing the reliability of the effect; it defines the relevant moderators for addressing the validity of the 2 main explanations for the FTE: the attentional and the fluency-attributional hypotheses. The analysis (random effect model) of a total of 128 experiments (N 3,338) showed that the effect of familiarity on perceived short durations (seconds) is highly reliable (g .52); the same (or a similar) effect also occurs for other fluency manipulations (g .51). The analysis supports assumptions generated by both the attentional and the fluency-misattributional explanations, suggesting that more research is needed to understand their possible dynamic relationship. Hence, this meta-analysis provides important guidance for future research with regard to time estimates. Public Significance Statement The present meta-analysis reviews evidence showing that more familiar stimuli are judged to have a longer duration than less familiar stimuli, showing this effect to have high reliability. In doing so, it brings together evidence provided by two separate literatures, time perception and processing fluency, to confront two alternative explanations: a) familiarity frees attentional resources to the temporal features of the stimulus, or b) the ease with which the stimulus is processed influences its perceived duration. Results support assumptions generated by both explanations, and future research should address how they relate.pt_PT
dc.description.sponsorshipFCTpt_PT
dc.description.versioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionpt_PT
dc.identifier.citationPsychological Bulletin, 146(3) 187–217.pt_PT
dc.identifier.doi10.1037/bul0000222pt_PT
dc.identifier.issn0033-2909
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10400.12/7706
dc.language.isoengpt_PT
dc.publisherAmerican Psychological Associationpt_PT
dc.relationSFRH/BD/ 62500/2009pt_PT
dc.relationUID/ PSI/04810/2013pt_PT
dc.relation.publisherversionhttp://dx.doi.org/10.1037/bul0000222pt_PT
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/pt_PT
dc.subjectDuration judgmentspt_PT
dc.subjectFamiliaritypt_PT
dc.subjectFluencypt_PT
dc.subjectRepetitionpt_PT
dc.subjectAttentionpt_PT
dc.titleSupplemental material for a meta-analytical review of the familiarity temporal effect : testing assumptions of the attentional and the fluency-attributional accountspt_PT
dc.typejournal article
dspace.entity.typePublication
oaire.citation.conferencePlaceWashingtonpt_PT
oaire.citation.endPage217pt_PT
oaire.citation.startPage187pt_PT
oaire.citation.titlePsychological Bulletinpt_PT
oaire.citation.volume3pt_PT
person.familyNameGarcia-Marques
person.givenNameTeresa
person.identifier.ciencia-idA71A-4DF9-9760
person.identifier.orcid0000-0002-6233-0799
person.identifier.ridP-4149-2015
person.identifier.scopus-author-id13805497600
rcaap.rightsrestrictedAccesspt_PT
rcaap.typearticlept_PT
relation.isAuthorOfPublicationc0f30712-5b70-4695-9b5c-b16c493956c0
relation.isAuthorOfPublication.latestForDiscoveryc0f30712-5b70-4695-9b5c-b16c493956c0

Files

Original bundle
Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
No Thumbnail Available
Name:
PB 146(3), 187–217.pdf
Size:
1.04 MB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format