Logo do repositório
 
Miniatura indisponível
Publicação

Stress and mental health: The role of emotional schemas and psychological flexibility in the context of COVID-19

Utilize este identificador para referenciar este registo.
Nome:Descrição:Tamanho:Formato: 
Journal of Contextual Behavioral Science 32.htm159.59 KBHTML Ver/Abrir

Orientador(es)

Resumo(s)

Stress has been associated with mental health. During the COVID-19 pandemic, stress responses were identified as an important factor affecting mental health. However, the mechanisms underlying this relationship remain unclear. Following a process-based approach, emotional schemas and psychological flexibility seem to be promising processes for understanding these impacts. The present study aims to evaluate the role of two potential processes – emotional schemas and psychological flexibility – in the relationship between stress responses and (positive and negative) mental health. A cross-sectional study was conducted with 583 individuals from the Portuguese population (M age = 44.8, 64.3% females). They completed measures of stress responses, emotional schemas, psychological flexibility, positive and negative mental health. The results demonstrated that emotional schemas and psychological flexibility significantly mediate the relationship between stress responses and mental health. Our findings highlight the importance of attending to emotional schemas and psychological flexibility within stressful contexts. Furthermore, it stresses the need to develop individualised intervention programs that target emotional schemas and psychological flexibility to promote and protect mental health, ultimately decreasing symptoms and increasing well-being.

Descrição

Palavras-chave

Emotional schemas Psychological flexibility Negative mental health Positive mental health COVID-19

Contexto Educativo

Citação

Sebastião, R., & Neto, D. D. (2024). Stress and mental health: The role of emotional schemas and psychological flexibility in the context of COVID-19. Journal of Contextual Behavioral Science, 32. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcbs.2024.100736

Projetos de investigação

Unidades organizacionais

Fascículo