Publication
I know the rule, but I'll just go with my gut: Is there a rational use of intuition?
| dc.contributor.author | Loureiro, Filipe Pereira | |
| dc.contributor.author | Garcia-Marques, Teresa | |
| dc.date.accessioned | 2018-04-02T10:32:52Z | |
| dc.date.available | 2018-04-02T10:32:52Z | |
| dc.date.issued | 2018 | |
| dc.description | Material suplementar disponível em: https://doi.org/10.1080/13546783.2018.1448300 | pt_PT |
| dc.description.abstract | Research has established that human thinking is often biased by intuitive judgement. The base-rate neglect effect provides such an example, so named because people often support their decisions in stereotypical individuating information, neglecting base-rates. Here, we test the hypothesis that reasoners acknowledge information provided by base-rates and may use individuating information in support of a “rational” decision process. Results from four experiments show that “base-rate neglecting” occurs when participants acknowledge sample distributions; participants who prefer individuating over base-rate information perceive base-rates as less diagnostic and are more confident in their individuating-based responses; and that posterior probabilities (assigned after all relevant information is considered) predict more individuating-based responses for individuating-preference participants (suggesting a rational process). However, data also show a deeper form of base-rate neglect: even when some participants report to prefer base-rate information, define individuating information as non-diagnostic, and their posterior probabilities suggest otherwise, they still provide individuating-based responses. | pt_PT |
| dc.description.sponsorship | Fundação para a Ciência e a Tecnologia (FCT) | pt_PT |
| dc.description.version | info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion | pt_PT |
| dc.identifier.citation | Thinking and Reasoning, 1-29. Doi: 10.1080/13546783.2018.1448300 | pt_PT |
| dc.identifier.doi | 10.1080/13546783.2018.1448300 | pt_PT |
| dc.identifier.issn | 1354-6783 | |
| dc.identifier.uri | http://hdl.handle.net/10400.12/6309 | |
| dc.language.iso | eng | pt_PT |
| dc.peerreviewed | yes | pt_PT |
| dc.publisher | Taylor & Francis | pt_PT |
| dc.relation | PTDC/PSIPCO/121925/201 | pt_PT |
| dc.relation.publisherversion | https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1080/13546783.2018.1448300 | pt_PT |
| dc.rights.uri | http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ | pt_PT |
| dc.subject | Judgement and decision-making | pt_PT |
| dc.subject | Intuition | pt_PT |
| dc.subject | Rationality | pt_PT |
| dc.subject | Base-rates | pt_PT |
| dc.title | I know the rule, but I'll just go with my gut: Is there a rational use of intuition? | pt_PT |
| dc.type | journal article | |
| dspace.entity.type | Publication | |
| oaire.awardURI | info:eu-repo/grantAgreement/FCT/5876/UID%2FPSI%2F04810%2F2013/PT | |
| oaire.citation.conferencePlace | United Kingdom | pt_PT |
| oaire.citation.endPage | 29 | pt_PT |
| oaire.citation.startPage | 1 | pt_PT |
| oaire.citation.title | Thinking and Reasoning | pt_PT |
| oaire.fundingStream | 5876 | |
| project.funder.identifier | http://doi.org/10.13039/501100001871 | |
| project.funder.name | Fundação para a Ciência e a Tecnologia | |
| rcaap.rights | restrictedAccess | pt_PT |
| rcaap.type | article | pt_PT |
| relation.isProjectOfPublication | bde29b74-579e-493a-920c-09723e43ef3d | |
| relation.isProjectOfPublication.latestForDiscovery | bde29b74-579e-493a-920c-09723e43ef3d |