Name: | Description: | Size: | Format: | |
---|---|---|---|---|
91.42 KB | Adobe PDF |
Authors
Advisor(s)
Abstract(s)
O presente trabalho reporta uma revisão crítica da literatura ao nível da resiliência no domínio do
abuso sexual na infância e adolescência. Esta é uma área que tem sido pouco explorada, em certa
medida, devido a problemas metodológicos e de conceptualização do constructo. Não obstante a
diversidade e controvérsia de propostas conceptuais, é relativamente consensual que a resiliência não
é sinónimo de invulnerabilidade mas que significa uma maior capacidade da criança/jovem para
manter o curso desenvolvimental normativo face a uma situação de stress ou adversidade. Assim, no
presente artigo é discutido o conceito de resiliência enquanto resultado desenvolvimental adaptativo
na sequência de uma experiência adversa. Neste âmbito, são exploradas as principais linhas de
investigação nas últimas décadas, e sistematizadas conclusões centrais neste domínio. Do mesmo
modo, são ainda definidos desafios e direcções futuras em termos de investigação. As conclusões da
presente revisão advertem para o papel interactivo e generativo da criança/jovem vítima e dos seus
contextos de vida no percurso de mudança desenvolvimental. Neste sentido, a adaptação positiva não
é uma tarefa individual da vítima mas de todos os intervenientes envolvidos, nomeadamente em termos
de disponibilidade de condições e redes de suporte favoráveis a uma recuperação adaptativa.
ABSTRACT: This manuscript reports a critical review on resilience in the field of sexual abuse in childhood and adolescence. This is an area that has been little explored, to some extent, due to methodological problems and conceptualization of the construct. Despite the diversity and controversy of conceptual proposals, it is relatively consensual that resilience does not mean invulnerability, but it means a greater ability of the child/youth to maintain the normative developmental course in a situation of stress or adversity. In the present article it is discussed the concept of resilience as adaptive developmental outcome following an adverse experience. In this context, are explored the main lines of research in recent decades and systematized central conclusions in this area. Likewise, are still defined challenges and set future directions in research. The conclusions of this review warn for the role of interactive and generative child/youth victims and their life contexts on the course of developmental change. In this sense, the positive adaptation is not an individual task of the victim but of all those involved, particularly in terms of conditions and availability of support networks favorable to an adaptive recovery.
ABSTRACT: This manuscript reports a critical review on resilience in the field of sexual abuse in childhood and adolescence. This is an area that has been little explored, to some extent, due to methodological problems and conceptualization of the construct. Despite the diversity and controversy of conceptual proposals, it is relatively consensual that resilience does not mean invulnerability, but it means a greater ability of the child/youth to maintain the normative developmental course in a situation of stress or adversity. In the present article it is discussed the concept of resilience as adaptive developmental outcome following an adverse experience. In this context, are explored the main lines of research in recent decades and systematized central conclusions in this area. Likewise, are still defined challenges and set future directions in research. The conclusions of this review warn for the role of interactive and generative child/youth victims and their life contexts on the course of developmental change. In this sense, the positive adaptation is not an individual task of the victim but of all those involved, particularly in terms of conditions and availability of support networks favorable to an adaptive recovery.
Description
Keywords
Abuso sexual Coping Recuperação Resiliência Coping Recovery Resilience Sexual abuse
Citation
Análise Psicológica, 30, 63-77
Publisher
Instituto Superior de Psicologia Aplicada