Loading...
Publication
Desenvolvimento da Escala de Regulação da Satisfação de Necessidades Psicológicas de Proximidade e Autonomia : relação com o bem-estar e mal-estar psicológicos
| Name: | Description: | Size: | Format: | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 91.96 KB | Adobe PDF |
Advisor(s)
Abstract(s)
Resumo: As Necessidades Psicológicas têm tido um papel chave no estudo do Bem-estar Psicológico. O Modelo da Complementaridade Paradigmática propôs que este Bem-estar resulta da regulação da satisfação
de sete pares de Necessidades dialécticas, entre as quais a Proximidade e Autonomia. Por sua vez, esta regulação é realizada através de um processo contínuo de negociação e balanceamento de cada par dialéctico. Pretendeu-se criar a Escala de Regulação de Satisfação de Necessidades – proximidade/Autonomia, ERSN-P/A, que avaliasse o grau de regulação destas necessidades e compreender a sua relação com o Bem-estar e Mal-estar Psicológicos, medidos pelo Inventário de Saúde Mental (ISM). Ambos os instrumentos foram aplicados a 237 participantes através de uma plataforma digital online. Os resultados, tal como esperado, revelam uma boa consistência interna da ERSN-P/A. Outrossim, verifica-se uma relação positiva e significativa entre o Bem-estar Psicológico e as regulações de Proximidade e Autonomia. Para estas necessidades, o Mal-estar Psicológico apresenta associações negativas e significativas. Na comparação de quatro grupos com regulação de necessidades distintas, registam-se diferenças significativas em termos de Bem-estar e Mal-estar Psicológicos. Discutem-se as limitações do estudo, as suas implicações para a prática clínica e propostas para investigações futuras.
Abstract: Psychological Needs have played a key role in Psychological Well-being research. The Paradigmatic Complementarity Model suggests that Well-being results from the regulation of seven pairs of dialectical Psychological Needs, including Relatedness and Autonomy. In turn, this regulation is accomplished through a continuous process of negotiation and balancing of each dialectical pair. This study intended to create a Needs Satisfaction Regulation Scale – Relatedness/Autonomy (NSRS-R/A) that assessed both needs’ regulation degree and to understand its association with Psychological Well-Being and Distress, who were both measured by the Portuguese version of the Mental Health Inventory. Both instruments were applied to 237 subjects through a web platform. As expected, results suggest good reliability for the NSRS-R/A. Furthermore, results indicate a significant positive association between Psychological Well-being and both needs’ regulation degree. Psychological Distress, on the other hand, presents a significant negative association with both needs. By comparing four groups with different needs’ regulation levels, significant differences were found concerning Psychological Well-being and Distress. Study constraints as well as clinical and psychotherapeutic implications and further research suggestions are presented.
Abstract: Psychological Needs have played a key role in Psychological Well-being research. The Paradigmatic Complementarity Model suggests that Well-being results from the regulation of seven pairs of dialectical Psychological Needs, including Relatedness and Autonomy. In turn, this regulation is accomplished through a continuous process of negotiation and balancing of each dialectical pair. This study intended to create a Needs Satisfaction Regulation Scale – Relatedness/Autonomy (NSRS-R/A) that assessed both needs’ regulation degree and to understand its association with Psychological Well-Being and Distress, who were both measured by the Portuguese version of the Mental Health Inventory. Both instruments were applied to 237 subjects through a web platform. As expected, results suggest good reliability for the NSRS-R/A. Furthermore, results indicate a significant positive association between Psychological Well-being and both needs’ regulation degree. Psychological Distress, on the other hand, presents a significant negative association with both needs. By comparing four groups with different needs’ regulation levels, significant differences were found concerning Psychological Well-being and Distress. Study constraints as well as clinical and psychotherapeutic implications and further research suggestions are presented.
Description
Keywords
Bem-estar psicológico Mal-estar psicológico Necessidade psicológica Proximidade Autonomia Modelo de complementaridade paradigmática Psychological well-being Psychological distress Psychological need Relatedness Autonomy Paradigmatic Complementarity Model
Citation
Bernardo, F., & Vasco, A. B. (2015). Desenvolvimento da Escala de Regulação da Satisfação de Necessidades Psicológicas de Proximidade e Autonomia: Relação com o bem-estar e mal-estar psicológicos. Análise Psicológica, 33(1), 3-17. https://doi.org/10.14417/ap.816
Publisher
Edições ISPA