Name: | Description: | Size: | Format: | |
---|---|---|---|---|
1.99 MB | Adobe PDF |
Advisor(s)
Abstract(s)
Heritage language speakers struggle in European classrooms with
insufficient material provided for second language (SL) learning
and assessment. Considering the amount of instruments and
pertinent studies in English SL, immigrant students are better
prepared than their peers in Romance language settings. This
study investigates how factors such as age and home language
can be used in the teaching environment to predict and examine
the development outcomes of SL students in verbal reasoning
and vocabulary tasks. Hundred and six Portuguese participants, SL
learners, between 8 and 17 years old, were assessed in vocabulary
frequency, verbal analogies and morphological extraction tasks. In
alphabetic languages (Romance languages), immigrant students
(in a SL learning situation) with a strong linguistic distance (a
home language with a very different orthographic foundation) are
expected to struggle in language learning in spite of being aware
of strategies that can improve their skills. The storage and
combination of morphemes can be a demanding task for
individual speakers at different levels. Cognitive mapping is
strongly based on linguistic features of L1 development. Results
show that home language, not age, was a significant predictor of
variation in student’s outcomes. Speakers of alphasyllabary
languages (Indo-Aryan languages as L1) were the poorest
performers, the ‘linguistic distance’ of their languages explaining
the performance’ results.
Description
Keywords
Second language education Immigrant students’ profiles Influence of home languages Diagnostic evaluation
Citation
International Journal of Multilingualism, 13, 184-212. doi:10.1080/14790718.2015.1079204
Publisher
Routledge