Loading...
Research Project
Untitled
Funder
Authors
Publications
Early attachment to mothers and fathers: Contributions to preschoolers' emotional regulation
Publication . Fernandes, Carla; Fernandes, Marilia; Santos, António J.; Antunes, Marta; Monteiro, Lígia; Vaughn, Brian E.; Verissimo, Manuela
Children acquire and develop emotional regulatory skills in the context of parent-child
attachment relationships, nonetheless empirical studies have focused mainly on mother
and less information is available regarding the role of both parent-child attachment
relationships. Furthermore, despite its importance, there is no information regarding
preschool years. This study aims to fill this gap by exploring the potential influences of
both mother-child and father-child attachments on preschooler’s later emotion regulation
observed in the peer group. Fifty-three Portuguese nuclear families (mother, father and
focal child) participated in the study; 47% of the children were boys and 53% were girls.
Attachment Security was assessed at home using the Attachment Behavior Q-set when
children were 3 years of age, and emotion regulation was observed in the preschool
classrooms attended by the children at age 5, using the California child Q-sort to derive
an Emotion Regulation Q-Scale. Results showed that the combined influence of both
parent-child attachment security predicted better emotion regulation results, than did
the specific contributions of each parent per se. Findings are consistent with integrative
approaches that highlight the value of including both mother- and father-child attachment
relationships, as well as their combined effect, when studying emotion regulation.
Loneliness and social functioning in adolescent peer victimization
Publication . Almeida, Telma Sousa; Ribeiro, Olívia; Freitas, Miguel; Rubin, Kenneth; Santos, António J.
Interpersonal adversity such as peer victimization has been shown to have complex
associations with other socio-emotional difficulties, particularly during adolescence. We
used a multidimensional peer nomination measure on a sample of 440 (52% girls)
11- to 17-year-old (M = 13.14 years, SD = 1.26) Portuguese youths to identify three
groups, classified by peers as (1) victimized adolescents who showed anxious withdrawn
behaviors in the context of the peer group (n = 111), (2) victimized adolescents who did
not exhibit anxious withdrawn behaviors (n = 104), and (3) non-victimized adolescents
(n = 225). We compared these groups on their peer-reported social functioning and
on their self-reported feelings of social and emotional loneliness (with peers and
family). Anxiously withdrawn victims were viewed by peers as more excluded, less
aggressive, less prosocial, and less popular than non-withdrawn victims and non-victims.
Non-anxiously withdrawn victims were considered more excluded than non-victims,
and more aggressive than both anxiously withdrawn victims and non-victims. Finally,
anxiously withdrawn victims reported feeling less integrated and intimate with their peers
than non-withdrawn victims and non-victims, which is indicative of greater feelings of
social and emotional loneliness at school. Youths in the current study did not report
feeling lonely in their family environment. Our findings thus provide further evidence that
victimized youths constitute a heterogeneous group, which differ in the way they behave
toward their peers and experience loneliness.
The meaning making model applied to community-dwelling adults with chronic pain
Publication . Ferreira-Valente, Maria Alexandra; Fontes, Fernando; Pais-Ribeiro, José; Jensen, Mark
Purpose: Chronic pain is a multidimensional experience that is influenced by biological,
psychological, social, and spiritual factors. The Meaning Making Model is a recent cognitive
behavioral model that has been developed to understand how psychosocial factors influence
adjustment to stressful events, such as having a chronic illness. This qualitative study aims to
understand the potential utility of this model for understanding the role of meaning making in
adjustment to chronic pain.
Materials and Methods: Eighteen community-dwelling adults with chronic low back pain
or chronic pain due to osteoarthritis participated in four focus groups. Participants were
asked open-ended questions about their pain experience, pain-related beliefs, meaning of
pain, and the perceived association between pain and their meaning in life and sense of
purpose. Data were submitted to thematic analysis and the identified themes were considered
in light of the Meaning Making Model.
Results: Three overarching themes emerged, each of which included two themes. The first
overarching theme – “appraised meaning of pain” – included the themes “causal attributions”
and “primary appraisals.” The second – “meaning making processes” – included the themes
“assimilation” and “accommodation.” The third – “meanings made” – included the themes
“pain as an opportunity” and “acceptance.”
Conclusion: The key themes that emerged as individuals with chronic pain discussed pain
and its impact are consistent with those that would be hypothesized as important from the
Meaning Making Model, providing preliminary support for the utility of this model in the
context of chronic pain. People with chronic pain appear to appraise pain in terms of its
cause, controllability, threat, loss, or challenge. When a discrepancy between the appraised
meaning of pain and one’s global meaning emerged, participants engaged in meaning making
processes (accommodation and assimilation), resulting in meanings made, such as
a reappraised meaning of pain, perceptions of growth, and acceptance.
Organizational Units
Description
Keywords
Contributors
Funders
Funding agency
Fundação para a Ciência e a Tecnologia
Funding programme
6817 - DCRRNI ID
Funding Award Number
157608