Pires, António Augusto PazoAraújo, Sónia Karitsis de2023-02-222023-02-222022-12-15http://hdl.handle.net/10400.12/9043Dissertação de Mestrado apresentada no Ispa – Instituto Universitário para obtenção de grau de Mestre na especialidade de Psicologia Clínica.Enquadramento: Existem vários estudos sobre as mudanças narrativas em processos terapêuticos, mas não existe uma revisão sistemática que compare as várias abordagens terapêuticas. Objetivo: Realizar uma revisão sistemática dos estudos que usaram o Narrative Process Coding System (NPCS; Angus, Hardtke, & Levitt, 1992, 1996) e o Narrative-Emotion Process Coding System (NEPCS 1.0; Boritz, Bryntwick, Angus, Greenberg, & Carpenter, 2012; NEPCS 2.0; Angus Narrative- Emotion Marker Lab., 2015) para saber qual abordagem terapêutica tem mais mudanças de narrativa e mudanças narrativas produtivas. Método: efetuaram-se pesquisas eletrónicas sistemáticas pela fórmula NEPCS or Narrative-Emotion Process Coding System or narrative-emotion markers treatment or intervention AND therapy or approaches orstrategies or techniques or methods nas bases de dados EBSCO Book Collection, PsycINFO, PsycARTICLES, PsycBOOKS, PEP Archive, Psychology and Behavioral Sciences Colletion,Academic Search Complete e na Web of Knowledge. Foram adicionados manualmente estudos selecionados através das referências bibliográficas. Resultados: Foram encontrados oito estudos que utilizaram a codificação NEPCS 2.0 e versões anteriores e compararam diferentes abordagens terapêuticas. Foram incluídos mais quatro estudos, que apesar de não compararem os marcadores NE-P entre abordagens, é possível verificar as mudanças de narrativa e a flexibilidade de narrativas em modelo de tratamento EFT, CBT e BDT. Conclusões: os sistemas de codificação dos processos narrativos foram aplicados a diferentes abordagens terapêuticas (EFT, CBT, BDT, CCT, PPT, PT, CT) e em diferentes patologias (depressão, PTSD, stress e GAD), confirmando a importância de identificar diferentes processos narrativos que contribuem para a mudança psicoterapêutica, mas faltam estudos que comparem as diferentes abordagens teóricas.Background: There are several studies on narrative changes but there is no systematic review that compares the various therapeutic approaches. Objective: Conduct a systematic review of studies using the Narrative Process Coding System (NPCS; Angus, Hardtke, & Levitt, 1992, 1996) and the Narrative-Emotion Process Coding System (NEPCS 1.0; Boritz, Bryntwick, Angus, Greenberg, & Carpenter, 2012; NEPCS 2.0; Angus Narrative-Emotion Marker Lab., 2015) to know which therapeutic approach has the most narrative changes and productive narrative changes. Method: systematic electronic searches were carried out using the formula NEPCS or Narrative-Emotion Process Coding System or narrative-emotion markers treatment or intervention AND therapy or approaches or strategies or techniques or methods in the EBSCO Book Collection, PsycINFO, PsycARTICLES, PsycBOOKS, databases. PEP Archive, Psychology and Behavioral Sciences Collection, Academic Search Complete and the Web of Knowledge. Studies selected through bibliographical references were manually added. Results: Eight studies were selected that used the complementary NEPCS 2.0 and earlier versions in different approaches and four more studies were included, which despite not comparing the NEP markers between approaches, it is possible to verify how narrative changes and narrative flexibility in EFT, CBT and BDT treatment model. Conclusions: The coding systems of narrative processes were applied to different therapeutic approaches (EFT, CBT, BDT, CCT, PPT, PT, CT) and in different pathologies (depression, PTSD and GAD), confirming the importance of identifying different narrative processes that contribute to psychotherapeutic change, but studies that compare the different theoretical approaches are lackingporNarrative-emotion process coding systemNEPCSPsychotherapyRevisão de literaturaliterature reviewmaster thesis203159837