Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:
http://hdl.handle.net/10400.12/1832| Title: | Behavioural indicators of welfare in farmed fish |
| Author: | Martins, Catarina I. M. Galhardo, Leonor Noble, Chris Damsgard, Børge Spedicato, Maria T. Zupa, Walter Beauchaud, Marilyn Kulczykowska, Ewa Massabuau, Jean-Charles Carter, Toby Planellas, Sonia Rey Kristiansen, Tore |
| Keywords: | Fish behaviour Well-being Aquaculture Operational welfare indicators Mental states Stress Appraisal |
| Issue Date: | 2012 |
| Publisher: | Springer |
| Citation: | Fish Physiology and Biochemistry, 38, 17-41 |
| Abstract: | Behaviour represents a reaction to the environment as fish perceive it and is therefore a key element of fish welfare. This review summarises the main findings on how behavioural changes have been used to assess welfare in farmed fish, using both functional and feeling-based approaches. Changes in foraging behaviour, ventilatory activity, aggression, individual and group swimming behaviour, stereotypic and abnormal behaviour have been linked with acute and chronic stressors in aquaculture and can therefore be regarded as likely indicators of poor welfare. On the contrary, measurements of exploratory behaviour, feed anticipatory activity and rewardrelated operant behaviour are beginning to be considered as indicators of positive emotions and welfare in fish. Despite the lack of scientific agreement about the existence of sentience in fish, the possibility that they are capable of both positive and negative emotions may contribute to the development of new strategies (e.g. environmental enrichment) to promote good welfare. Numerous studies that use behavioural indicators of welfare show that behavioural changes can be interpreted as either good or poor welfare depending on the fish species. It is therefore essential to understand the species-specific biology before drawing any conclusions in relation to welfare. In addition, different individuals within the same species may exhibit divergent coping strategies towards stressors, and what is tolerated by some individuals may be detrimental to others. Therefore, the assessment of welfare in a few individuals may not represent the average welfare of a group and vice versa. This underlines the need to develop on-farm, operational behavioural welfare indicators that can be easily used to assess not only the individual welfare but also the welfare of the whole group (e.g. spatial distribution). With the ongoing development of video technology and image processing, the on-farm surveillance of behaviour may in the near future represent a low-cost, noninvasive tool to assess the welfare of farmed fish. |
| Peer review: | yes |
| URI: | http://hdl.handle.net/10400.12/1832 |
| ISSN: | 0920-1742 |
| Appears in Collections: | BMAR - Artigos em revistas internacionais |
Files in This Item:
| File | Description | Size | Format | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| FPB 2012 38 17–41.pdf | 368,08 kB | Adobe PDF | View/Open |
Items in Repository are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.











